Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 16 — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 16 — part 2
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
339 for · 302 against · 12 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 32 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 16/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196559
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 339 for, 302 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 52 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “systemic”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 2No vote 9 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 2No vote 8 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 11Against 154Abst. 2No vote 17 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 36Against 38Abst. 3No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 12Abst. 3No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Germany0130
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 64

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 64 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 7 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote315 for, 297 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 578 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 148 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment305 for, 325 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 582 voters
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.89 406 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 44 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote280 for, 322 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.89 593 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment308 for, 309 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.89 602 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point h — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote286 for, 237 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 513 voters
28 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote336 for, 266 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 577 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 32 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment304 for, 334 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 609 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote304 for, 305 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.88 593 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment276 for, 307 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 582 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196559
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 16 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196559, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196559 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196559,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 16 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196559}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196559},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196559, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}