Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 8 — part 3

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 8 — part 3
Result
388 for · 169 against · 88 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 8/3
Vote id
196546
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 388 for, 169 against, 88 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 60 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to issue recommendations to the Member States on the provision of comprehensive sexuality education, in line with UNESCO standards;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 1Abst. 4No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 102Against 20Abst. 39No vote 23 of 184Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
ECRFor 4Against 69Abst. 3No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 1Against 43Abst. 32No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 5Against 13Abst. 9No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria401
Belgium300
Bulgaria303
Cyprus200
Czechia410
Germany2025
Denmark110
Estonia100
Spain0119
Finland200
France212
Greece700
Croatia122
Hungary600
Ireland100
Italy421
Lithuania111
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland1812
Portugal411
Romania322
Sweden500
Slovenia040
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.89 495 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital D — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote347 for, 170 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 527 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote344 for, 216 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.88 555 voters
19 Dec 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.86 477 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 101 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSeparate vote365 for, 168 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 554 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote382 for, 159 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.85 506 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote351 for, 204 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 558 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 87 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote362 for, 163 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 534 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote341 for, 136 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 479 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 8 — part 3 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196546, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196546 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196546,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 8 — part 3 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196546}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196546},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196546, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}