Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 8 — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote: Paragraph 8 — part 2
Decision: No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result: 472 for · 133 against · 45 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 16 September 2026, 14:32

More facts (6)

Position: vote 21 of 98 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label: A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 8/2
Text: Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier: 2025/2074(INI)
Vote id: 196545

Position: vote 21 of 98 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label: A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 8/2
Text: Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier: 2025/2074(INI)
Vote id: 196545

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “stresses the importance of reliable, evidence-based and age-appropriate health information for women and girls as well as men and boys throughout the life course, and of education on SRHR, including fertility, pregnancy, contraception, maternal health and post-natal care, consent, bodily integrity, privacy, personal autonomy, respect and the prevention of gender-based violence;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 40	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 44	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 50	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 129	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 69	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 78	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 112	Against 22	Abst. 27	No vote 23 of 184	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.54
ECR	For 8	Against 56	Abst. 12	No vote 8 of 84	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.61
Patriots	For 46	Against 29	Abst. 1	No vote 8 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.41
ESN	For 1	Against 21	Abst. 1	No vote 4 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.87
No group	For 17	Against 5	Abst. 4	No vote 2 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	4–1–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	3–0–3	2–0–1	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	4–0–1	2–1–1	5–0–0	no member voted	0–0–2
Germany	2–0–0	15–0–0	14–0–0	9–0–0	24–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–12–0	6–0–1
Denmark	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	3–0–0	4–0–0	20–0–0	1–0–0	3–1–14	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	5–0–0	12–0–0	11–0–0	3–0–1	0–1–3	28–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0
Greece	3–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	1–3–1	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	0–9–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	9–0–0	4–0–0	19–0–0	2–0–0	5–1–1	0–21–0	6–0–1	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	1–2–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	7–0–0	4–0–0	1–1–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	17–2–3	0–15–2	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–3	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	8–0–0	3–0–0	6–1–0	1–4–1	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–0–3	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	6–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	5–0–1

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Austria	4	1	0
Belgium	3	0	0
Bulgaria	3	0	3
Cyprus	2	0	0
Czechia	4	0	1
Germany	24	4	0
Denmark	2	0	0
Estonia	1	0	0
Spain	3	1	14
Finland	2	0	0
France	3	0	1
Greece	7	0	0
Croatia	1	3	1
Hungary	6	0	0
Ireland	1	0	0
Italy	5	1	1
Lithuania	1	2	0
Luxembourg	2	0	0
Latvia	2	0	0
Malta	0	2	0
Netherlands	4	0	0
Poland	17	2	3
Portugal	4	0	3
Romania	6	1	0
Sweden	5	0	0
Slovenia	0	4	0
Slovakia	0	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claire FITA group that day: S&D · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
David MCALLISTER group that day: EPP · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS group that day: EPP · Spain
Evin INCIR group that day: S&D · Sweden
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS group that day: EPP · Spain
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
François-Xavier BELLAMY group that day: EPP · France
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Hristo PETROV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Iuliu WINKLER group that day: EPP · Romania
Ivan DAVID group that day: ESN · Czechia
Jana TOOM group that day: Renew · Estonia
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI group that day: EPP · Poland
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Javier ZARZALEJOS group that day: EPP · Spain
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Karlo RESSLER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Laurent CASTILLO group that day: Patriots · France
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Manfred WEBER group that day: EPP · Germany
Marco FALCONE group that day: EPP · Italy
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Mary KHAN group that day: ESN · Germany
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG group that day: No group · Germany
Mihai TUDOSE group that day: S&D · Romania
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nikola MINCHEV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Nina CARBERRY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Ondřej KNOTEK group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Pekka TOVERI group that day: EPP · Finland
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Regina DOHERTY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Riho TERRAS group that day: EPP · Estonia
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT group that day: EPP · Spain
Sander SMIT group that day: ECR · Netherlands
Sandro GOZI group that day: Renew · France
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN group that day: EPP · Finland
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN group that day: Renew · France
Sven SIMON group that day: EPP · Germany
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH group that day: ESN · Germany
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
21 May 2026	Paragraph 49 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap	Split vote	358 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted	For 69 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.86 478 voters
12 Feb 2026	Recital M — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	341 for, 136 against, 58 abstained Adopted	For 64 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.85 481 voters
9 Jul 2025	Paragraph 22 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum	Split vote	454 for, 169 against, 40 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by The Left, S&D, Members	r · shared0.84 598 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	351 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted	For 63 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.84 506 voters
20 May 2026	Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	Split vote	465 for, 139 against, 27 abstained Adopted	For 74 %		r · shared0.83 579 voters
28 Apr 2026	Paragraph 28 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Split vote	459 for, 134 against, 46 abstained Adopted	For 72 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.83 580 voters
7 May 2025	Paragraph 31 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service	Split vote	412 for, 152 against, 84 abstained Adopted	For 64 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.83 581 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	357 for, 134 against, 53 abstained Adopted	For 66 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.83 492 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	338 for, 147 against, 66 abstained Adopted	For 61 %	Requested by Patriots, Greens	r · shared0.83 500 voters
9 Jul 2025	Paragraph 23 — part 3 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum	Split vote	452 for, 155 against, 59 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.83 599 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Resolution · report by Billy Kelleher 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 3 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 3 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 6 — part 4 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 6 — part 5 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 8 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 8 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 16 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 16 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 16 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196545
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 8 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196545, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196545 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196545,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 8 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196545}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196545},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196545, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}