Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 6 — part 4

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 6 — part 4
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
601 for · 46 against · 9 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Members (A), Members (B)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 6/4
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196537
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 601 for, 46 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 92 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘emphasises the importance of science-based, efficient and innovation-friendly health policies that take into account biological and social differences between women and men and that address the disparities therein; reiterates that research and innovation models in the health sector should drive developments that are in the interest of citizens;’ without the words ‘and social’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 161Against 4Abst. 1No vote 18 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 69Against 3Abst. 2No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 61Against 15Abst. 1No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
ESNFor 3Against 21Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 20Against 3Abst. 4No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria600
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany3000
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain1900
Finland200
France500
Greece700
Croatia600
Hungary600
Ireland100
Italy520
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland1921
Portugal600
Romania800
Sweden500
Slovenia400
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196537
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 6 — part 4 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196537, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196537 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196537,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 6 — part 4 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196537}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196537},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196537, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}