Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 84 to article 4, after paragraph 1

Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034

Vote
Amendment 84 to article 4, after paragraph 1
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
168 for · 505 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 13 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0216/2026 – Adnan Dibrani – Article 4, after § 1 – Am 84
Text
Report A-10-2026-0216
Dossier
2025/0590(COD)
Vote id
196502
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 168 for, 505 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 3 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 131Abst. 0No vote 4 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 174Abst. 1No vote 8 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 2Against 23Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 11Against 13Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy2100
Lithuania200
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1700
Romania600
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 677 members

No vote recorded, 40

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 40 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2025Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Amendment163 for, 450 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 600 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 14 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment179 for, 464 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 616 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment137 for, 326 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 451 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 142 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment169 for, 446 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.92 611 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.91 426 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 39 Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU importsAmendment169 for, 506 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.91 639 voters
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther119 for, 337 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.91 436 voters
16 Jun 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Procedural135 for, 468 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.91 624 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 41 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment175 for, 463 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 630 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment157 for, 428 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 577 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 4 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196502
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 84 to article 4, after paragraph 1 — Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196502, reference 2025/0590(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196502 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196502,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 84 to article 4, after paragraph 1 — Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196502}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196502},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196502, reference 2025/0590(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}