Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after recital F

Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure

Vote: Amendment 6, after recital F
Decision: No. 16 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result: 213 for · 426 against · 20 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 16 September 2026, 14:25

More facts (6)

Position: vote 12 of 13 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – After recital F – Am 6
Text: Report A-10-2026-0212
Dossier: 2026/2024(INI)
Vote id: 196492

Position: vote 12 of 13 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – After recital F – Am 6
Text: Report A-10-2026-0212
Dossier: 2026/2024(INI)
Vote id: 196492

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 32	Abst. 8	No vote 4 of 44	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.70
Greens	For 0	Against 44	Abst. 2	No vote 7 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.93
S&D	For 1	Against 120	Abst. 4	No vote 10 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
Renew	For 2	Against 70	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
EPP	For 22	Against 150	Abst. 0	No vote 12 of 184	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.81
ECR	For 74	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 9 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.98
Patriots	For 77	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 24	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 13	Against 10	Abst. 4	No vote 1 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–0–2	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	2–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–4–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	0–0–1	1–0–1
Germany	0–2–0	0–15–0	0–14–0	0–9–0	0–31–0	no member voted	no member voted	13–0–0	0–7–1
Denmark	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	2–2–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–19–0	0–1–0	0–21–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–8–0	0–5–0	0–13–0	0–12–0	2–3–0	4–0–0	28–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	6–1–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	1–4–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	10–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–1–8	0–4–0	0–18–0	0–2–0	7–1–0	19–0–0	7–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–4–0	3–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–23–0	18–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–4	0–3–0	0–7–0	5–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	1–4–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–1

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against
Austria	0	2
Belgium	0	5
Bulgaria	0	2
Germany	0	9
Denmark	2	2
Estonia	0	1
Spain	0	1
Finland	0	3
France	0	12
Ireland	0	3
Italy	0	2
Lithuania	0	2
Luxembourg	0	1
Latvia	0	1
Netherlands	0	7
Poland	0	1
Portugal	0	2
Romania	0	3
Sweden	0	3
Slovenia	0	2
Slovakia	0	6

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 659 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Dragoş BENEA group that day: S&D · Romania
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: ECR · Bulgaria
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS group that day: EPP · Spain
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe LUPO group that day: S&D · Italy
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Hristo PETROV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Kristian VIGENIN group that day: S&D · Bulgaria
Lara MAGONI group that day: ECR · Italy
Laurent CASTILLO group that day: Patriots · France
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Mary KHAN group that day: ESN · Germany
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nils UŠAKOVS group that day: S&D · Latvia
Nina CARBERRY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Ondřej KNOTEK group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Regina DOHERTY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Ruggero RAZZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN group that day: EPP · Finland
Ştefan MUŞOIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN group that day: Renew · France
Tineke STRIK group that day: Greens · Netherlands
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU group that day: EPP · Romania
Željana ZOVKO group that day: EPP · Croatia

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
21 May 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 The need to reduce work-related fatalities	Amendment	146 for, 316 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.93 435 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	Amendment	195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.93 586 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	Amendment	196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.93 590 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
21 May 2026	Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Amendment	175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.91 514 voters
26 Nov 2025	Amendment 15 to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders	Amendment	198 for, 446 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.91 592 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after recital H Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	Amendment	200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 33 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.91 591 voters
19 Dec 2024	Amendment 12 to paragraph 1, point h Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Amendment	164 for, 398 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.90 517 voters
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 53 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Amendment	212 for, 439 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 32 %		r · shared0.90 627 voters
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee	Amendment	194 for, 467 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.90 630 voters
3 Apr 2025	Amendment 17 to Article 2 Directive 2024/1760 (UE) Article 37, point 1 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	176 for, 412 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.90 534 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Resolution · report by Rasa Juknevičienė 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 9 to paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Final vote — text as a whole Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196492
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6, after recital F — Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196492, reference 2026/2024(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196492 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196492,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after recital F — Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196492}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196492},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196492, reference 2026/2024(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}