Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10, after paragraph 64

Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure

Vote: Amendment 10, after paragraph 64
Decision: No. 16 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result: 175 for · 438 against · 50 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 16 September 2026, 14:23

More facts (6)

Position: vote 6 of 13 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – After § 64 – Am 10
Text: Report A-10-2026-0212
Dossier: 2026/2024(INI)
Vote id: 196489

Position: vote 6 of 13 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – After § 64 – Am 10
Text: Report A-10-2026-0212
Dossier: 2026/2024(INI)
Vote id: 196489

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 39	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 44	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 0	Against 50	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 5	Against 123	Abst. 1	No vote 6 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.93
Renew	For 0	Against 72	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 28	Against 137	Abst. 7	No vote 12 of 184	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.69
ECR	For 34	Against 5	Abst. 36	No vote 9 of 84	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.22
Patriots	For 72	Against 2	Abst. 1	No vote 9 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.94
ESN	For 25	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 11	Against 10	Abst. 5	No vote 2 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–0–2	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	0–0–2	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–1–3	1–3–0	2–2–1	1–0–0	0–0–2
Germany	0–2–0	0–15–0	0–14–0	0–9–0	0–30–0	no member voted	no member voted	13–0–0	0–7–1
Denmark	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	1–0–1	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–1	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–20–0	0–1–0	21–0–0	1–0–1	6–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–8–0	0–5–0	0–13–0	0–12–0	0–4–0	4–0–0	28–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	1–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	8–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–8–0	0–4–0	0–18–0	0–2–0	0–7–1	0–0–21	7–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	1–0–1	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–0–3	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–4–0	2–0–1	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–23–0	13–0–3	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	5–3–1	0–3–0	0–8–0	3–2–1	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	1–4–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–6–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	4–0–1

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Belgium	0	0	2
Bulgaria	0	0	2
Cyprus	1	0	0
Czechia	1	3	0
Denmark	1	0	0
Estonia	0	0	1
Spain	1	0	1
Finland	1	0	0
France	4	0	0
Greece	2	0	0
Croatia	1	0	0
Italy	0	0	21
Lithuania	1	0	1
Latvia	0	0	3
Netherlands	2	0	1
Poland	13	0	3
Romania	3	2	1
Sweden	3	0	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Christophe GOMART group that day: EPP · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Costas MAVRIDES group that day: S&D · Cyprus
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
David MCALLISTER group that day: EPP · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: ECR · Bulgaria
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS group that day: EPP · Spain
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Hristo PETROV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Laurent CASTILLO group that day: Patriots · France
Ľuboš BLAHA group that day: No group · Slovakia
Lucia ANNUNZIATA group that day: S&D · Italy
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Mario FURORE group that day: The Left · Italy
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Mary KHAN group that day: ESN · Germany
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nils UŠAKOVS group that day: S&D · Latvia
Nina CARBERRY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Ondřej KNOTEK group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Regina DOHERTY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN group that day: EPP · Finland
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN group that day: Renew · France
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.88 586 voters
18 Dec 2025	Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear	Amendment	196 for, 367 against, 19 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.88 538 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	Amendment	210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Patriots, EPP	r · shared0.88 593 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
29 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 15 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Separate vote	210 for, 417 against, 14 abstained Rejected	For 33 %		r · shared0.87 590 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers	Amendment	210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Patriots, EPP	r · shared0.87 592 voters
12 Mar 2026	Amendment 31 to paragraph 13 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024	Amendment	148 for, 382 against, 30 abstained Rejected	For 26 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.87 523 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.87 582 voters
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre	Amendment	148 for, 414 against, 35 abstained Rejected	For 25 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.86 557 voters
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 11 to paragraph 9 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission	Amendment	204 for, 423 against, 17 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.86 594 voters
27 Nov 2025	Amendment 21, adding text after recital D Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan	Amendment	213 for, 356 against, 13 abstained Rejected	For 37 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.86 535 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Resolution · report by Rasa Juknevičienė 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 9 to paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 6, adding text after recital F Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Final vote — text as a whole Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196489
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 10, after paragraph 64 — Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196489, reference 2026/2024(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196489 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196489,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10, after paragraph 64 — Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196489}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196489},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196489, reference 2026/2024(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}