Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9 to paragraph 64

Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure

Vote: Amendment 9 to paragraph 64
Decision: No. 16 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result: 205 for · 442 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 16 September 2026, 14:23

More facts (6)

Position: vote 5 of 13 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – § 64 – Am 9
Text: Report A-10-2026-0212
Dossier: 2026/2024(INI)
Vote id: 196488

Position: vote 5 of 13 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – § 64 – Am 9
Text: Report A-10-2026-0212
Dossier: 2026/2024(INI)
Vote id: 196488

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 1	Against 38	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 44	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Greens	For 0	Against 49	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 6	Against 121	Abst. 2	No vote 6 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.91
Renew	For 0	Against 72	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 11	Against 151	Abst. 4	No vote 18 of 184	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.86
ECR	For 75	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Patriots	For 76	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 25	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 11	Against 11	Abst. 4	No vote 2 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	2–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	4–0–1	4–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	0–2–0	0–15–0	0–14–0	0–9–0	0–29–0	no member voted	no member voted	13–0–0	0–7–1
Denmark	0–1–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	0–4–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–1	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	1–2–0	0–3–0	0–20–0	0–1–0	0–21–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–7–0	0–5–0	0–13–0	0–12–0	3–1–1	4–0–0	28–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	1–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	9–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–9–0	0–4–0	0–19–0	0–2–0	0–8–0	21–0–0	7–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–4–0	3–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–23–0	17–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	5–2–2	0–3–0	0–8–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	1–4–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–6–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Austria	0	2	0
Belgium	0	5	0
Bulgaria	0	2	0
Germany	0	9	0
Denmark	0	4	0
Estonia	0	1	0
Spain	0	1	0
Finland	0	3	0
France	0	12	0
Ireland	0	3	0
Italy	0	2	0
Lithuania	0	2	0
Luxembourg	0	1	0
Latvia	0	1	0
Netherlands	0	7	0
Poland	0	1	0
Portugal	0	2	0
Romania	0	3	0
Sweden	0	3	0
Slovenia	0	2	0
Slovakia	0	6	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 60

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 60 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Andreas SCHWAB group that day: EPP · Germany
Annamária VICSEK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Christel SCHALDEMOSE group that day: S&D · Denmark
Christian DOLESCHAL group that day: EPP · Germany
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Costas MAVRIDES group that day: S&D · Cyprus
Csaba BOGDÁN group that day: EPP · Hungary
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Dóra DÁVID group that day: EPP · Hungary
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: ECR · Bulgaria
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS group that day: EPP · Spain
Eszter LAKOS group that day: EPP · Hungary
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Hristo PETROV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Kinga KOLLÁR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Laurent CASTILLO group that day: Patriots · France
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Mary KHAN group that day: ESN · Germany
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Monika BEŇOVÁ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nils UŠAKOVS group that day: S&D · Latvia
Nina CARBERRY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Ondřej KNOTEK group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Regina DOHERTY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Roberts ZĪLE group that day: ECR · Latvia
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN group that day: EPP · Finland
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN group that day: Renew · France
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Viktor WEISZ group that day: EPP · Hungary
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Younous OMARJEE group that day: The Left · France

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee	Amendment	194 for, 467 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.94 629 voters
9 Jul 2025	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 3 2023 and 2024 reports on Albania	Amendment	208 for, 460 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.94 614 voters
21 May 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 The need to reduce work-related fatalities	Amendment	146 for, 316 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.94 436 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
9 Jul 2025	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 2023 and 2024 reports on Albania	Amendment	210 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.94 624 voters
29 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 45 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Separate vote	204 for, 421 against, 13 abstained Rejected	For 32 %		r · shared0.94 586 voters
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Recruitment of children by organised crime	Amendment	169 for, 389 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.94 527 voters
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III	Amendment	195 for, 466 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by S&D, Patriots	r · shared0.94 609 voters
23 Jan 2025	Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria	Amendment	164 for, 435 against, 13 abstained Rejected	For 27 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.94 561 voters
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crime	Amendment	181 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.94 533 voters
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report	Amendment	200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.94 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Resolution · report by Rasa Juknevičienė 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 6, adding text after recital F Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Final vote — text as a whole Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196488
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 9 to paragraph 64 — Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196488, reference 2026/2024(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196488 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196488,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9 to paragraph 64 — Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196488}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196488},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196488, reference 2026/2024(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}