Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7 to paragraph 35

Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure

Vote: Amendment 7 to paragraph 35
Decision: No. 16 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result: 231 for · 426 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 16 September 2026, 14:23

More facts (6)

Position: vote 3 of 13 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – § 35 – Am 7
Text: Report A-10-2026-0212
Dossier: 2026/2024(INI)
Vote id: 196486

Position: vote 3 of 13 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – § 35 – Am 7
Text: Report A-10-2026-0212
Dossier: 2026/2024(INI)
Vote id: 196486

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 1	Against 38	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 44	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Greens	For 1	Against 48	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.97
S&D	For 10	Against 120	Abst. 1	No vote 4 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.87
Renew	For 3	Against 69	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
EPP	For 29	Against 141	Abst. 3	No vote 11 of 184	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.72
ECR	For 76	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Patriots	For 77	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 25	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 9	Against 10	Abst. 5	No vote 4 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	1–1–0	0–6–0	2–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	3–1–1	4–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	0–2–0	0–15–0	0–14–0	0–9–0	0–31–0	no member voted	no member voted	13–0–0	0–6–2
Denmark	0–1–0	0–2–0	2–0–0	1–3–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–1	0–1–0	0–1–1	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–20–0	0–1–0	0–21–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–7–0	0–5–0	1–12–0	0–12–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	28–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0
Greece	1–2–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	1–4–1	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	10–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	1–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–9–0	0–4–0	0–19–0	0–2–0	6–2–0	21–0–0	7–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–4–0	3–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–23–0	18–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	6–2–0	0–3–0	0–8–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	1–2–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	1–4–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	2–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–2

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against
Belgium	0	2
Cyprus	0	1
Germany	0	2
Denmark	0	1
Spain	0	3
Finland	0	3
France	0	7
Greece	1	2
Ireland	0	3
Italy	0	9
Netherlands	0	1
Portugal	0	2
Sweden	0	2

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 51

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 51 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: ECR · Bulgaria
Erik KALIŇÁK group that day: No group · Slovakia
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS group that day: EPP · Spain
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Hristo PETROV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Laurent CASTILLO group that day: Patriots · France
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Lukas MANDL group that day: EPP · Austria
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Mary KHAN group that day: ESN · Germany
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nina CARBERRY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Ondřej KNOTEK group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Regina DOHERTY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Roberts ZĪLE group that day: ECR · Latvia
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN group that day: EPP · Finland
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN group that day: Renew · France
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS group that day: Greens · Lithuania
Younous OMARJEE group that day: The Left · France

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
21 May 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 The need to reduce work-related fatalities	Amendment	146 for, 316 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.91 437 voters
12 Feb 2026	Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 14 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire	Amendment	171 for, 338 against, 13 abstained Rejected	For 33 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.90 482 voters
12 Feb 2026	Amendment 7 to recital J Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire	Amendment	178 for, 340 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.90 485 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report	Amendment	200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.90 577 voters
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 12 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Amendment	199 for, 413 against, 25 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.89 590 voters
9 Jul 2025	Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 29 2023 and 2024 reports on Albania	Amendment	223 for, 448 against, 14 abstained Rejected	For 33 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.89 627 voters
18 Jun 2025	Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report	Amendment	201 for, 420 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by S&D, Members	r · shared0.89 581 voters
19 Jun 2025	Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial Deal	Amendment	186 for, 378 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 33 %	Requested by S&D, Patriots	r · shared0.89 523 voters
12 Feb 2026	Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire	Amendment	178 for, 338 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.89 485 voters
9 Oct 2025	Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes	Amendment	199 for, 391 against, 15 abstained Rejected	For 33 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.89 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Resolution · report by Rasa Juknevičienė 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 9 to paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Amendment 6, adding text after recital F Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure — Final vote — text as a whole Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196486
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 — Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196486, reference 2026/2024(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196486 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196486,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 — Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196486}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196486},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196486, reference 2026/2024(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}