Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 78 to recital BZ

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 78 to recital BZ
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
83 for · 513 against · 55 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 135 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital BZ – Am 78
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196430
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 83 for, 513 against, 55 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 13 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 50Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 123Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 5Against 157Abst. 3No vote 19 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 64Against 7Abst. 4No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
PatriotsFor 10Against 21Abst. 43No vote 10 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 2Against 22Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus010
Czechia020
Germany080
Spain001
France010
Greece130
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania010
Slovenia100
Slovakia051

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 125 to paragraph 9 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment90 for, 534 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 606 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment134 for, 283 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 407 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment145 for, 417 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment137 for, 326 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 434 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment148 for, 285 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 421 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment148 for, 294 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 417 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment164 for, 435 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.76 557 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment146 for, 311 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.76 422 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 38, adding text after recital K 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAmendment170 for, 410 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.75 550 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 4 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Amendment159 for, 424 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.75 560 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196430
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 78 to recital BZ — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196430, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196430 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196430,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 78 to recital BZ — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196430}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196430},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196430, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}