Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 34 — part 2

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Paragraph 34 — part 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
440 for · 189 against · 34 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 44 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 34/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196352
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 440 for, 189 against, 34 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 14Against 1Abst. 23No vote 6 of 44Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.41
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 171Against 3Abst. 1No vote 9 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 2Against 69Abst. 6No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 1No vote 13 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 20Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria400
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany3000
Denmark110
Estonia200
Spain2200
Finland400
France500
Greece700
Croatia600
Hungary600
Ireland300
Italy900
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland2300
Portugal600
Romania800
Sweden401
Slovenia310
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.94 592 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.94 581 voters
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseFinal347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.94 498 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote453 for, 178 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.93 598 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 590 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.93 574 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote440 for, 175 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 587 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 88 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote447 for, 199 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.93 598 voters
8 May 2025Final vote Screening of foreign investments in the UnionFinal378 for, 173 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 527 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentSplit vote380 for, 173 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196352
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 34 — part 2 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196352, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196352 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196352,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 34 — part 2 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196352}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196352},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196352, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}