Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 60, after paragraph 4

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 60, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
122 for · 465 against · 71 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 4 – Am 60
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196321
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 122 for, 465 against, 71 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 4No vote 5 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 2Against 49Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 3Against 123Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 4Against 71Abst. 0No vote 3 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 14Against 159Abst. 2No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 2No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 20Against 5Abst. 39No vote 20 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.41
ESNFor 2Against 5Abst. 19No vote 1 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.60
No groupFor 3Against 18Abst. 5No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria006
Belgium300
Czechia600
Denmark100
Spain600
France0028
Greece100
Italy005
Latvia100
Netherlands050
Poland200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment134 for, 283 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 409 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment145 for, 417 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 569 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment148 for, 285 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 423 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 580 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment148 for, 294 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 419 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 145 to paragraph 4, indent 7 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment192 for, 448 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 589 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 565 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 154 to paragraph 28 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment185 for, 445 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 587 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 142 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment169 for, 446 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.79 593 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 164 to paragraph 74 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment194 for, 472 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 612 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196321
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 60, after paragraph 4 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196321, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196321 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196321,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 60, after paragraph 4 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196321}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196321},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196321, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}