Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 88, after Recital 3

Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund

Vote
Amendment 88, after Recital 3
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
165 for · 465 against · 36 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:21
More facts (6)
Position
vote 49 of 53 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – After Recital 3 – Am 88
Text
Report A-10-2026-0202
Dossier
2025/0418(COD)
Vote id
196302
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 165 for, 465 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 38Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 2Against 49Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 2Against 70Abst. 0No vote 6 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 2Against 167Abst. 7No vote 8 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 71Against 4Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 46Against 2Abst. 27No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ESNFor 24Against 3Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 17Against 7Abst. 2No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark020
Spain130
Finland010
France140
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 51

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 51 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 602 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 579 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 107 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment193 for, 459 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.90 648 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment160 for, 464 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 626 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 604 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 566 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 27 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment187 for, 451 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 606 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 588 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 426 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 567 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment194 for, 444 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 605 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196302
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 88, after Recital 3 — Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196302, reference 2025/0418(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196302 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196302,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 88, after Recital 3 — Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196302}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196302},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196302, reference 2025/0418(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}