Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 93 to article 4, after paragraph 2

Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund

Vote
Amendment 93 to article 4, after paragraph 2
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
193 for · 455 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:18
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 53 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Article 4, after § 2 – Am 93
Text
Report A-10-2026-0202
Dossier
2025/0418(COD)
Vote id
196292
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 193 for, 455 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 0Against 167Abst. 6No vote 11 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia600
Denmark100
Spain600
France2800
Greece100
Hungary900
Italy500
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 556 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 596 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 573 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 593 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 583 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 645 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 618 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.98 570 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 590 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 619 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196292
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 93 to article 4, after paragraph 2 — Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196292, reference 2025/0418(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196292 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196292,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 93 to article 4, after paragraph 2 — Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196292}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196292},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196292, reference 2025/0418(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}