Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after paragraph 35

The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027

Vote
Amendment 7, after paragraph 35
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
159 for · 372 against · 136 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 14:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0219/2026 – Sabrina Repp – After § 35 – Am 7
Text
Report A-10-2026-0219
Dossier
2025/2115(INI)
Vote id
196208
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 159 for, 372 against, 136 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 24 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 40Against 0Abst. 88No vote 7 of 135Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.53
RenewFor 7Against 67Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 3Against 172Abst. 0No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 1Against 72Abst. 2No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 52Abst. 21No vote 11 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
ESNFor 0Against 7Abst. 18No vote 2 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.58
No groupFor 19Against 1Abst. 7No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark200
Spain400
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment167 for, 294 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 448 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 448 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment138 for, 391 against, 107 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAmendment210 for, 349 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 539 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 444 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment172 for, 288 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 436 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment201 for, 411 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 601 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 440 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 596 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.83 544 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196208
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7, after paragraph 35 — The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196208, reference 2025/2115(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196208 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196208,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after paragraph 35 — The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196208}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196208},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196208, reference 2025/2115(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}