Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 83 — part 2

Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee

Vote
Paragraph 83 — part 2
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
451 for · 147 against · 67 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:58
More facts (6)
Position
vote 23 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0218/2026 – Hristo Petrov – § 83/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0218
Dossier
2025/2184(INI)
Vote id
196203
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 451 for, 147 against, 67 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “fairly remunerated,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 127Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 56Against 7Abst. 10No vote 5 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
EPPFor 149Against 9Abst. 14No vote 12 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 4Against 44Abst. 27No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
PatriotsFor 5Against 58Abst. 11No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
ESNFor 1Against 25Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 19Against 4Abst. 4No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark200
Spain400
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.87 440 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesFinal420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.86 598 voters
21 May 2026Recital S — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote344 for, 111 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 470 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Amendment 10 — part 1 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment418 for, 180 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 571 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.85 586 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 81 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote307 for, 146 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 476 voters
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027Final432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.84 610 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 108 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote419 for, 198 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.84 577 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 6 — part 2 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in HaitiSplit vote370 for, 180 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 528 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Final404 for, 208 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.83 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196203
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 83 — part 2 — Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196203, reference 2025/2184(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196203 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196203,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 83 — part 2 — Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196203}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196203},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196203, reference 2025/2184(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}