Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 7 — part 2

The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan

Vote
Paragraph 7 — part 2
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2026
Result
281 for · 285 against · 31 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, S&D · split vote: Patriots, EPP, ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 7/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0361
Dossier
2026/2799(RSP)
Vote id
195767
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 281 for, 285 against, 31 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 47 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 1Abst. 0No vote 26 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 62Against 2Abst. 0No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 3Against 159Abst. 0No vote 22 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 5Against 38Abst. 24No vote 17 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
PatriotsFor 3Against 57Abst. 2No vote 23 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 16Against 6Abst. 2No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia070
Denmark001
Spain301
France0240
Greece010
Italy050
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 597 members

No vote recorded, 122

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 122 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 10 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment252 for, 305 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 478 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendments 1 + 25 (voted as one), adding text after citation 21 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment301 for, 335 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 545 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 1, point f Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment299 for, 336 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 545 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.89 561 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 3 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote284 for, 335 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.89 528 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 520 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment289 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 546 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 532 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment292 for, 348 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 575 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 522 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195767
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 7 — part 2 — The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 195767, reference 2026/2799(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195767 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-195767,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 7 — part 2 — The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195767}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195767},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195767, reference 2026/2799(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}