Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after paragraph 5

The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan

Vote
Amendment 4, after paragraph 5
Result
72 for · 482 against · 49 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0357/2026 – After § 5 – Am 4
Vote id
195763
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 72 for, 482 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 12 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 15Against 2Abst. 31No vote 5 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
S&DFor 4Against 104Abst. 1No vote 26 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 0Against 164Abst. 0No vote 20 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 50Abst. 12No vote 23 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 4No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Czechia050
Germany0300
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0180
Finland030
France050
Greece060
Croatia040
Hungary060
Ireland040
Italy080
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0210
Portugal060
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia040
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 603 members

No vote recorded, 116

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 116 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 590 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment71 for, 476 against, 84 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 534 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 557 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 524 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 513 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 37 to paragraph 91 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment73 for, 492 against, 91 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 558 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment98 for, 513 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 527 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment94 for, 475 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.84 507 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 517 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment99 for, 516 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 533 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4, after paragraph 5 — The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 195763, reference 2026/2799(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195763 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-195763,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after paragraph 5 — The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195763}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195763},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195763, reference 2026/2799(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}