Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after paragraph 3

The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan

Vote
Amendment 6, after paragraph 3
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2026
Result
172 for · 431 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:36
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
RC-B10-0357/2026 – After § 3 – Am 6
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0361
Dossier
2026/2799(RSP)
Vote id
195754
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 172 for, 431 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 3Against 46Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 0Against 110Abst. 0No vote 25 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 164Abst. 0No vote 18 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 66Against 2Abst. 0No vote 16 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 60Against 1Abst. 0No vote 24 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 5Abst. 4No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark030
Spain130
Finland020
France130
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 47 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment185 for, 446 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 558 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 532 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 16 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment190 for, 470 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 593 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 3 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningAmendment192 for, 454 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.96 575 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 535 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 551 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 568 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 29 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 562 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 532 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 53 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment197 for, 464 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.96 567 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195754
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6, after paragraph 3 — The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 195754, reference 2026/2799(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195754 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-195754,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after paragraph 3 — The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195754}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195754},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195754, reference 2026/2799(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}