Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2026
Result
366 for · 192 against · 39 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:46
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
A10-0167/2026 – Ľudovít Ódor – Motion for a resolution
Text
Report A-10-2026-0167
Dossier
2025/2211(INI)
Vote id
194869
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 366 for, 192 against, 39 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 61 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 19Abst. 5No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
GreensFor 42Against 1Abst. 3No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 98Against 1Abst. 8No vote 28 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 63Against 4Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 149Against 4Abst. 6No vote 25 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 0Against 62Abst. 3No vote 19 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 5No vote 17 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 2Against 14Abst. 8No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium110
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Romania100
Sweden003
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 597 members

No vote recorded, 122

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 122 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Recital J — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote411 for, 202 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 530 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Banking Union – annual report 2025Final376 for, 187 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.90 501 voters
20 Jan 2026Recital B — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote427 for, 212 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 547 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 3 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote448 for, 188 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 564 voters
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 537 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 65 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.88 522 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 559 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.87 537 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote425 for, 199 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.87 558 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 487 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/194869
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 194869, reference 2025/2211(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/194869 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-194869,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/194869}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/194869},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194869, reference 2025/2211(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}