Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2 — part 2, after recital M

2025 Commission report on Ukraine

Vote
Amendment 2 — part 2, after recital M
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 8 Jul 2026
Result
164 for · 459 against · 24 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 100 of 111 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0172/2026 – Michael Gahler – After recital M – Am 2/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0172
Dossier
2025/2259(INI)
Vote id
195533
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 164 for, 459 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘whereas Ukraine’s forced and accelerated accession does not serve the interests of EU citizens;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 49Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 73Abst. 1No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 2Against 165Abst. 1No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 44Against 12Abst. 20No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
PatriotsFor 72Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 25Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 20Against 3Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia800
Denmark100
Spain500
France2300
Greece100
Hungary800
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland300
Portugal101

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Mar 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther87 for, 291 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 22 %r · shared0.93 366 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment184 for, 454 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 591 voters
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.93 380 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 16 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment197 for, 444 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 589 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment175 for, 446 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 591 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 433 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 593 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment189 for, 440 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 587 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 1 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment169 for, 429 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 572 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment192 for, 451 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 591 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 34 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment201 for, 429 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 619 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195533
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2 — part 2, after recital M — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195533, reference 2025/2259(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195533 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195533,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 — part 2, after recital M — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195533}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195533},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195533, reference 2025/2259(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}