Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 101 — part 1

2025 Commission report on Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 101 — part 1
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 8 Jul 2026
Result
447 for · 130 against · 78 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 85 of 111 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Greens, ESN
Official label
A10-0172/2026 – Michael Gahler – § 101/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0172
Dossier
2025/2259(INI)
Vote id
195518
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 447 for, 130 against, 78 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Notes the strategic importance of a future deal for the sale of two VVER-1000 nuclear reactors from Bulgaria to Ukraine as an example of deepening energy cooperation, and notes, furthermore, that this will contribute to Ukraine’s energy security; highlights the project’s potential to strengthen regional energy connectivity and the integration of the Ukrainian energy system into the EU’s energy system;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 36Abst. 2No vote 5 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 1Against 49Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 114Against 3Abst. 6No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 63Against 1Abst. 9No vote 5 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
EPPFor 160Against 1Abst. 7No vote 17 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 73Against 1Abst. 2No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 29Against 24Abst. 21No vote 11 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.09
ESNFor 2Against 10Abst. 14No vote 1 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
No groupFor 3Against 5Abst. 17No vote 2 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia100
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland100
France300
Greece002
Croatia100
Italy2300
Lithuania200
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1900
Romania510
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

No vote recorded, 64

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 64 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 5 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote467 for, 116 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.83 548 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 2 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote480 for, 112 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.80 551 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.75 577 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendments 27 + 89 + 130 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment497 for, 152 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.74 603 voters
12 Mar 2025Separate vote on paragraph 52 White paper on the future of European defenceSeparate vote439 for, 136 against, 96 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 602 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 23 — part 1 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote509 for, 113 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 575 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 156 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sectionsAmendment519 for, 74 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.73 582 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 23 — part 3 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote444 for, 164 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.73 583 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 8 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote475 for, 134 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.72 582 voters
18 Dec 2025Paragraph 11 — part 2 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against LithuaniaSplit vote431 for, 110 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.72 510 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195518
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 101 — part 1 — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195518, reference 2025/2259(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195518 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195518,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 101 — part 1 — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195518}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195518},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195518, reference 2025/2259(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}