Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22, after paragraph 61

2025 Commission report on Ukraine

Vote
Amendment 22, after paragraph 61
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 8 Jul 2026
Result
181 for · 411 against · 51 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 74 of 111 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, ECR, EPP
Official label
A10-0172/2026 – Michael Gahler – After § 61 – Am 22
Text
Report A-10-2026-0172
Dossier
2025/2259(INI)
Vote id
195505
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 411 against, 51 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 22Abst. 7No vote 13 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 123Abst. 1No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 3No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 26Against 146Abst. 2No vote 11 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ECRFor 50Against 1Abst. 23No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.51
PatriotsFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 11Against 1Abst. 13No vote 2 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
No groupFor 21Against 1Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany602
Spain100
France100
Greece110
Luxembourg100
Poland100
Romania100
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 13, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment205 for, 350 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Patriots, The Leftr · shared0.91 501 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.91 585 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 58 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment201 for, 419 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 591 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 5 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment209 for, 339 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by S&D, ECR, The Leftr · shared0.90 496 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichAmendment177 for, 369 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 518 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 540 voters
8 May 2025Amendments 3 + 19 (voted as one) to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 1, paragraph 5 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment200 for, 351 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, S&D, ECRr · shared0.89 501 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 38 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment210 for, 357 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.89 520 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 554 voters
23 Oct 2025Final vote on motion B10-0457/2025 Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuelsFinal180 for, 373 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.88 522 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195505
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 22, after paragraph 61 — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195505, reference 2025/2259(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195505 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195505,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22, after paragraph 61 — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195505}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195505},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195505, reference 2025/2259(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}