Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 35 — part 5, after paragraph 32

2025 Commission report on Ukraine

Vote
Amendment 35 — part 5, after paragraph 32
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 8 Jul 2026
Result
600 for · 11 against · 38 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 55 of 111 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, EPP · split vote: Renew
Official label
A10-0172/2026 – Michael Gahler – After § 32 – Am 35/5
Text
Report A-10-2026-0172
Dossier
2025/2259(INI)
Vote id
195489
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 600 for, 11 against, 38 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 92 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘victims and their families, especially in the light of Poland’s steadfast support for Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression; considers that this decision undermines neighbourly relations and previous efforts to address unresolved and painful aspects of bilateral historical relations in a spirit of true and sincere reconciliation and is not in line with European values; calls for de-escalation and renewed efforts in good faith towards reconciliation;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 2No vote 5 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 49Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 72Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 162Against 0Abst. 4No vote 19 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 53Against 0Abst. 21No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
PatriotsFor 67Against 0Abst. 5No vote 13 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 24Against 2Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 13Against 7Abst. 6No vote 1 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Cyprus200
Czechia103
Germany3100
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1800
Finland300
France500
Greece700
Croatia600
Ireland400
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland2300
Portugal600
Romania1000
Sweden401
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195489
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 35 — part 5, after paragraph 32 — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195489, reference 2025/2259(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195489 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195489,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 35 — part 5, after paragraph 32 — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195489}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195489},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195489, reference 2025/2259(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}