Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 19 to paragraph 29

2025 Commission report on Ukraine

Vote
Amendment 19 to paragraph 29
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 8 Jul 2026
Result
173 for · 437 against · 34 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 37 of 111 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, ECR, EPP
Official label
A10-0172/2026 – Michael Gahler – § 29 – Am 19
Text
Report A-10-2026-0172
Dossier
2025/2259(INI)
Vote id
195468
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 173 for, 437 against, 34 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 28Abst. 2No vote 14 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 3Against 121Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 1Against 71Abst. 2No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 4Against 161Abst. 5No vote 15 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 48Against 1Abst. 23No vote 12 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.50
PatriotsFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus100
Czechia110
Germany602
Spain100
France010
Greece110
Luxembourg100
Poland100
Romania100
Slovakia510

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment175 for, 446 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 587 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment180 for, 381 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.93 503 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 594 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 48 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment170 for, 462 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.93 601 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.93 398 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 20 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment191 for, 462 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.93 595 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 587 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 583 voters
10 Feb 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther99 for, 317 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 23 %r · shared0.92 390 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 565 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195468
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 19 to paragraph 29 — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195468, reference 2025/2259(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195468 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195468,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 19 to paragraph 29 — 2025 Commission report on Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195468}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195468},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195468, reference 2025/2259(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}