Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 25, after paragraph 37

EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)

Vote
Amendment 25, after paragraph 37
Result
107 for · 538 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0182/2026 – Javi López, Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 37 – Am 25
Dossier
2025/0810R
Vote id
195373
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 1No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 173Abst. 0No vote 12 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 65Abst. 7No vote 13 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
ESNFor 4Against 19Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.60
No groupFor 13Against 8Abst. 5No vote 1 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium021
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany0120
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0190
Finland020
France0120
Greece040
Croatia040
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy0160
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta030
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment99 for, 516 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 583 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 557 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 545 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 561 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 55 to recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 552 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in HaitiAmendment84 for, 464 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 522 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 550 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 562 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment104 for, 495 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 566 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 521 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 25, after paragraph 37 — EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195373, reference 2025/0810R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195373 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195373,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 25, after paragraph 37 — EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195373}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195373},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195373, reference 2025/0810R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}