Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets

Vote: Final vote on the whole text
Decision: No. 6 of the sitting of 8 Jul 2026
Result: 388 for · 248 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 8 July 2026, 13:12

More facts (7)

Effect: Objection passed — this vote decided the decision
Position: vote 14 of 14 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Greens, ECR
Official label: B10-0337/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text: Motion B-10-2026-0337
Dossier: 2026/2680(DEA)
Vote id: 195361

Effect: Objection passed — this vote decided the decision
Position: vote 14 of 14 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Greens, ECR
Official label: B10-0337/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text: Motion B-10-2026-0337
Dossier: 2026/2680(DEA)
Vote id: 195361

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Objection passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 40	Abst. 1	No vote 4 of 45	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Greens	For 0	Against 48	Abst. 1	No vote 4 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.97
S&D	For 27	Against 94	Abst. 2	No vote 12 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.65
Renew	For 14	Against 40	Abst. 19	No vote 5 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.32
EPP	For 159	Against 14	Abst. 0	No vote 12 of 185	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.88
ECR	For 78	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Patriots	For 72	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 13 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 24	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 14	Against 12	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 27	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–1–1	5–0–0	0–0–1	5–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	4–1–0	0–3–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	4–0–0	1–0–0	8–0–0	0–0–1	2–0–0
Germany	0–4–0	0–14–0	0–13–0	3–1–5	30–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	13–0–0	1–7–0
Denmark	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–1	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–4–0	0–3–0	5–11–2	0–0–1	18–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–2–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	2–1–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–9–0	0–4–0	2–11–0	1–0–11	5–0–0	3–0–0	23–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0
Greece	0–2–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	7–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–8–0	0–4–0	5–11–0	2–0–0	8–0–0	22–0–0	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–6–0	3–1–0	3–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	1–0–0	22–0–0	20–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0
Portugal	0–1–1	no member voted	0–5–0	0–2–0	7–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	8–0–0	0–3–0	9–1–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	5–1–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Belgium	3	0	0
Bulgaria	3	0	0
Cyprus	1	0	0
Czechia	1	0	0
Denmark	1	0	0
Estonia	1	0	0
Spain	2	0	0
Finland	1	0	0
France	3	0	0
Greece	2	0	0
Croatia	1	0	0
Italy	22	0	0
Lithuania	2	0	0
Latvia	3	0	0
Netherlands	3	0	0
Poland	20	0	0
Romania	6	0	0
Sweden	3	0	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 660 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Abir AL-SAHLANI group that day: Renew · Sweden
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Aleksandar NIKOLIC group that day: Patriots · France
Alexandr VONDRA group that day: ECR · Czechia
Alexandre VARAUT group that day: Patriots · France
Ana Catarina MENDES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Bruno GONÇALVES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Christine ANDERSON group that day: ESN · Germany
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ group that day: No group · Romania
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO group that day: EPP · Spain
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Francisco ASSIS group that day: S&D · Portugal
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Giuseppe LUPO group that day: S&D · Italy
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Ilaria SALIS group that day: The Left · Italy
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI group that day: EPP · Poland
Jordan BARDELLA group that day: Patriots · France
José CEPEDA group that day: S&D · Spain
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL group that day: Patriots · Spain
Julien SANCHEZ group that day: Patriots · France
Katarina BARLEY group that day: S&D · Germany
Kathleen FUNCHION group that day: The Left · Ireland
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK group that day: Greens · Netherlands
Konstantinos ARVANITIS group that day: The Left · Greece
Lina GÁLVEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Luděk NIEDERMAYER group that day: EPP · Czechia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marco SQUARTA group that day: ECR · Italy
Marie DAUCHY group that day: Patriots · France
Marion MARÉCHAL group that day: ECR · France
Mihai TUDOSE group that day: S&D · Romania
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Nicola ZINGARETTI group that day: S&D · Italy
Nikola BARTŮŠEK group that day: ECR · Czechia
Philippe OLIVIER group that day: Patriots · France
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA group that day: EPP · Spain
Radan KANEV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Rasmus ANDRESEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Raúl DE LA HOZ QUINTANO group that day: EPP · Spain
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT group that day: EPP · Spain
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Séverine WERBROUCK group that day: Patriots · France
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN group that day: Renew · France
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Tomasz FROELICH group that day: ESN · Germany
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Veronika VRECIONOVÁ group that day: ECR · Czechia
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Viktória FERENC group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS group that day: Patriots · Latvia

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 — part 3 Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines	Amendment	305 for, 238 against, 21 abstained Adopted	For 54 %	Requested by S&D, Greens, The Left	r · shared0.85 526 voters
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 6, adding text after recital Q Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines	Amendment	288 for, 263 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 51 %	Requested by S&D, Greens, The Left	r · shared0.83 527 voters
26 Nov 2025	Amendments 62 + 123 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders	Amendment	394 for, 259 against, 13 abstained Adopted	For 59 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.83 612 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 7 to paragraph 6 Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines	Amendment	298 for, 264 against, 7 abstained Adopted	For 52 %	Requested by S&D, Greens, The Left	r · shared0.83 531 voters
3 Apr 2025	Amendment 8, adding text after recital B Energy-intensive industries	Amendment	348 for, 260 against, 3 abstained Adopted	For 57 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.83 555 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted	For 56 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.82 588 voters
21 Oct 2025	Proposal to reject the text Final vote Monitoring framework for resilient European forests	Rejection	370 for, 264 against, 9 abstained Adopted	For 58 %		r · shared0.82 591 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained Adopted	For 51 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.81 551 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted	For 56 %	Requested by ESN, ECR	r · shared0.81 589 voters
21 May 2026	Amendment 13 to recital A The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Amendment	293 for, 263 against, 10 abstained Adopted	For 52 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.81 527 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Objection to a Commission measure · motion for a resolution 8 Jul 2026 Objection passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 7 to paragraph 3, introductory part Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 1 to recital B Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 3, adding text after recital M Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195361
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195361, reference 2026/2680(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195361 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195361,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195361}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195361},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195361, reference 2026/2680(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}