Amendment 1 to recital B · Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets · Vote

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 40	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 45	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 0	Against 50	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 0	Against 126	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 1	Against 73	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
EPP	For 9	Against 164	Abst. 2	No vote 10 of 185	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.91
ECR	For 78	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Patriots	For 74	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 11 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 26	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 13	Against 11	Abst. 1	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	3–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	1–0–0	8–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	0–4–0	0–14–0	0–13–0	0–9–0	0–31–0	no member voted	no member voted	14–0–0	0–7–1
Denmark	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–4–0	0–4–0	0–19–0	0–1–0	0–18–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–9–0	0–4–0	0–12–0	0–12–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	24–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0
Greece	0–2–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	1–5–0	no member voted	8–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–8–0	0–4–0	0–17–0	0–2–0	2–4–2	22–0–0	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	3–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–23–0	20–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0
Portugal	0–1–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–8–0	0–3–0	1–9–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	1–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Austria	0	2	0
Belgium	0	2	0
Czechia	0	1	0
Germany	0	14	0
Denmark	0	3	0
Spain	0	4	0
Finland	0	2	0
France	0	4	0
Croatia	0	1	0
Italy	0	4	0
Lithuania	0	1	0
Luxembourg	0	1	0
Latvia	0	1	0
Netherlands	0	5	0
Romania	0	1	0
Sweden	0	3	0
Slovenia	0	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 668 members

No vote recorded, 51

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 51 members

Name · group that day · country

Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Aleksandar NIKOLIC group that day: Patriots · France
Alexandr VONDRA group that day: ECR · Czechia
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Branislav ONDRUŠ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Christine ANDERSON group that day: ESN · Germany
Claire FITA group that day: S&D · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ group that day: No group · Romania
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO group that day: EPP · Spain
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Francisco ASSIS group that day: S&D · Portugal
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Giuseppe LUPO group that day: S&D · Italy
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Ilaria SALIS group that day: The Left · Italy
João OLIVEIRA group that day: The Left · Portugal
Jordan BARDELLA group that day: Patriots · France
José CEPEDA group that day: S&D · Spain
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL group that day: Patriots · Spain
Julien SANCHEZ group that day: Patriots · France
Katarina BARLEY group that day: S&D · Germany
Kathleen FUNCHION group that day: The Left · Ireland
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK group that day: Greens · Netherlands
Konstantinos ARVANITIS group that day: The Left · Greece
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marco SQUARTA group that day: ECR · Italy
Marie DAUCHY group that day: Patriots · France
Marion MARÉCHAL group that day: ECR · France
Mihai TUDOSE group that day: S&D · Romania
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Nikola BARTŮŠEK group that day: ECR · Czechia
Philippe OLIVIER group that day: Patriots · France
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA group that day: EPP · Spain
Radan KANEV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Rasmus ANDRESEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Raúl DE LA HOZ QUINTANO group that day: EPP · Spain
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT group that day: EPP · Spain
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Séverine WERBROUCK group that day: Patriots · France
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN group that day: Renew · France
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Veronika VRECIONOVÁ group that day: ECR · Czechia
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Viktória FERENC group that day: Patriots · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
7 May 2025	Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: Agencies	Amendment	200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.97 596 voters
22 May 2025	Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism	Amendment	171 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 536 voters
10 Mar 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024	Amendment	182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 566 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 43 Discharge 2024: Agencies	Amendment	198 for, 438 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 600 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds	Amendment	192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 602 voters
21 May 2026	Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Amendment	175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.96 525 voters
3 Apr 2025	Amendment 14, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	180 for, 403 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 547 voters
18 May 2026	Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in Modena	Other	134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 30 %		r · shared0.96 416 voters
10 Mar 2026	Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024	Amendment	180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 563 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 30 to paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: Agencies	Amendment	195 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.96 601 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Objection to a Commission measure · motion for a resolution 8 Jul 2026 Objection passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 7 to paragraph 3, introductory part Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Amendment 3, adding text after recital M Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026
Vote Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets — Final vote — text as a whole Roll-call vote · 8 Jul 2026 8 Jul 2026 Objection passed

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195357
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1 to recital B — Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195357, reference 2026/2680(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195357 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195357,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 to recital B — Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195357}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195357},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195357, reference 2026/2680(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}