Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after paragraph 1

Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets

Vote
Amendment 4, after paragraph 1
Result
188 for · 456 against · 2 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 14 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 4
Vote id
195347
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 188 for, 456 against, 2 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 5 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 48Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 118Abst. 0No vote 17 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 3Against 166Abst. 1No vote 15 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 72Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 11Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria040
Cyprus020
Czechia040
Germany0300
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0170
Finland030
France050
Greece070
Croatia060
Hungary060
Ireland040
Italy251
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0220
Portugal070
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia040
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.99 506 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.98 401 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 590 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, point c Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment189 for, 447 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 590 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 15 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment188 for, 470 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 640 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 581 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 53 to paragraph 1 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment193 for, 460 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 577 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 98 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 436 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 571 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 589 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment195 for, 429 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4, after paragraph 1 — Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195347, reference 2026/2680(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195347 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195347,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after paragraph 1 — Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195347}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195347},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195347, reference 2026/2680(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}