Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 9

A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 9
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 7 Jul 2026
Result
461 for · 121 against · 74 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
7 July 2026, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0173/2026 – Marcos Ros Sempere – § 9
Text
Report A-10-2026-0173
Dossier
2025/2181(INI)
Vote id
195249
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 461 for, 121 against, 74 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 0Abst. 2No vote 14 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 127Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 3No vote 5 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 176Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 15Abst. 55No vote 11 of 82Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.66
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 5No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 7Against 12Abst. 9No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus001
Czechia001
Denmark010
Estonia001
Spain002
Finland010
France030
Greece002
Italy0022
Lithuania100
Latvia003
Netherlands030
Poland0118
Romania015
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 589 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal441 for, 131 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.92 598 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawFinal455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.92 580 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedSeparate vote462 for, 128 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 618 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 558 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals AgencyFinal482 for, 110 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.91 610 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal429 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.90 597 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 554 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 556 voters
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal441 for, 125 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.90 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195249
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 9 — A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning”. Vote, 7 July 2026. votingId 195249, reference 2025/2181(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195249 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-07-195249,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 9 — A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195249}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195249},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195249, reference 2025/2181(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}