Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark

Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark

Vote
Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 6 Jul 2026
Result
283 for · 142 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
6 July 2026, 18:16
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark
Vote id
195333
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 283 for, 142 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 20 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 4Against 70Abst. 7No vote 54 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
RenewFor 45Against 1Abst. 0No vote 32 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 118Against 0Abst. 1No vote 66 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 51 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 25 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 11Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 3Abst. 3No vote 9 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium100
Czechia700
Denmark100
Spain500
France2200
Greece100
Hungary800
Italy100
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 436 members

No vote recorded, 283

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 283 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Referral back to committee Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural426 for, 202 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.96 395 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 402 voters
1 Apr 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural427 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.95 400 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 377 voters
16 Dec 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsFinal428 for, 218 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.93 401 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroFinal374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.92 373 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 64 + 129 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment442 for, 216 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 407 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 4 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment423 for, 232 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 405 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksFinal355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.92 339 voters
17 Sept 2026Recital F — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.91 359 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-06/195333
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark — Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark”. Vote, 6 July 2026. votingId 195333. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-06/195333 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 6 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 6 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-06, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-06/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-06-195333,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark — Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-06},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-06/195333}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-06/195333},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195333. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-06 (CC BY 4.0)}
}