Skip to content

Decision

Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark

Effect
Adopted
Result
283 for · 142 against · 11 abstained roll call
Date
6 July 2026, 18:16
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a large majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
195333
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 283 for, 142 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

The agenda was changed.

Backed by Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens and S&D.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 20 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 4Against 70Abst. 7No vote 54 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
RenewFor 45Against 1Abst. 0No vote 32 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 118Against 0Abst. 1No vote 66 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 51 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 25 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 11Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 3Abst. 3No vote 9 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 13

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria106040.44
Belgium87070.30
Bulgaria8108—
Cyprus2103—
Czechia131160.80
Germany35242350.36
Denmark84030.50
Estonia0007—
Spain20200200.25
Finland4407—
France36220230.43
Greece87060.30
Croatia4305—
Hungary121080.88
Ireland5009—
Italy12116470.12
Lithuania4205—
Luxembourg3102—
Latvia3105—
Malta2103—
Netherlands148090.45
Poland3200211.00
Portugal640110.40
Romania831210.50
Sweden108030.33
Slovenia5202—
Slovakia110130.88

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 436 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark Roll call283 for, 142 against, 11 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark”. Decision, 6 July 2026. votingId 195333. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-06/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 6 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 6 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-06, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-06/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-07-06-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-06},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-06/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-06/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 195333. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-06 (CC BY 4.0)}
}