Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3 — part 2, after paragraph 4

Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich

Vote
Amendment 3 — part 2, after paragraph 4
Result
135 for · 366 against · 60 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 13 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN, ECR
Official label
B10-0294/2026 – After § 4 – Am 3/2
Vote id
194640
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 135 for, 366 against, 60 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 24 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “encourages the US administration to continue along this humanitarian-diplomatic track;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 28Abst. 8No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 105Abst. 0No vote 29 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 62Abst. 0No vote 16 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 19Against 121Abst. 2No vote 43 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ECRFor 29Against 1Abst. 35No vote 17 of 82Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
PatriotsFor 53Against 0Abst. 6No vote 26 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 10Against 7Abst. 8No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium001
Bulgaria001
Cyprus100
Czechia004
Denmark100
Estonia001
Spain101
Finland010
France004
Greece100
Croatia001
Italy1800
Latvia003
Netherlands201
Poland0015
Romania203
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 561 members

No vote recorded, 158

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 158 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 91 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment214 for, 408 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 503 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment199 for, 402 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 495 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 491 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 92 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment220 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 500 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.89 504 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 20 Security of energy supply in the EUAmendment198 for, 434 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Membersr · shared0.89 516 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment193 for, 404 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 495 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 480 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 50 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment220 for, 415 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.88 506 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 51 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment217 for, 416 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, Renewr · shared0.88 503 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3 — part 2, after paragraph 4 — Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194640, reference 2026/2766(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194640 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194640,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3 — part 2, after paragraph 4 — Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194640}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194640},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194640, reference 2026/2766(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}