Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital G — part 2

Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland

Vote
Recital G — part 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2026
Result
149 for · 331 against · 60 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 33 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: EPP
Official label
B10-0295/2026 – Recital G/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0307
Dossier
2026/2772(RSP)
Vote id
194606
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 149 for, 331 against, 60 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘whereas the Latvian military’s five-hour delay in communicating its response, the lack of public warnings in Rēzekne and the failure of initial radar detection ignited an intense public backlash, causing a political crisis that led to the collapse of the Latvian Government;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 6Against 95Abst. 0No vote 34 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 3Against 56Abst. 0No vote 19 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 5Against 130Abst. 0No vote 50 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 58Against 4Abst. 0No vote 20 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 18Against 0Abst. 41No vote 26 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.54
ESNFor 19Against 0Abst. 4No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 3Against 4Abst. 15No vote 7 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria120
Belgium020
Bulgaria120
Czechia050
Germany0250
Denmark020
Estonia010
Spain1140
Finland020
France030
Greece050
Croatia030
Hungary060
Ireland040
Italy060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland2190
Portugal060
Romania050
Sweden050
Slovenia020
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 540 members

No vote recorded, 179

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 179 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 179 + 385 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment222 for, 415 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.82 484 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 188 + 388 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment229 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Greens, The Leftr · shared0.82 483 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment223 for, 416 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.82 485 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 178 + 384 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment225 for, 412 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.81 486 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.81 420 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAmendment209 for, 413 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.79 490 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 251 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment251 for, 354 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.76 484 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 183 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment225 for, 387 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.76 477 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 224 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment248 for, 352 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.76 485 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 23 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaAmendment167 for, 414 against, 97 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.76 499 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194606
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital G — part 2 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194606, reference 2026/2772(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194606 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194606,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital G — part 2 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194606}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194606},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194606, reference 2026/2772(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}