Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after paragraph 25

Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland

Vote
Amendment 6, after paragraph 25
Result
62 for · 418 against · 68 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 33 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0295/2026 – After § 25 – Am 6
Vote id
194594
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 62 for, 418 against, 68 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 11 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 3Abst. 3No vote 8 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 8Against 2Abst. 31No vote 12 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.63
S&DFor 4Against 96Abst. 3No vote 32 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 1Against 59Abst. 0No vote 18 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 0Against 137Abst. 0No vote 48 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 60Abst. 0No vote 21 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 1Against 50Abst. 11No vote 23 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
ESNFor 0Against 3Abst. 20No vote 4 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 16Against 8Abst. 0No vote 5 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria002
Belgium001
Czechia001
Germany0110
Denmark003
Spain300
Finland001
France003
Croatia100
Italy300
Luxembourg001
Latvia010
Netherlands005
Romania001
Sweden003
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 548 members

No vote recorded, 171

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 171 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 3 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment72 for, 476 against, 68 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 470 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 6 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment93 for, 517 against, 67 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 508 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 376 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment82 for, 530 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 499 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 28 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2024Amendment82 for, 569 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 506 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 57 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment119 for, 490 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 490 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 9 to recital D Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment77 for, 520 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 489 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment65 for, 526 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 495 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 45, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment111 for, 511 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 485 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment75 for, 519 against, 86 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 515 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment78 for, 582 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 504 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6, after paragraph 25 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194594, reference 2026/2772(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194594 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194594,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after paragraph 25 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194594}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194594},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194594, reference 2026/2772(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}