Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 3

Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 3
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2026
Result
408 for · 96 against · 38 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 33 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR
Official label
B10-0295/2026 – § 9/3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0307
Dossier
2026/2772(RSP)
Vote id
194591
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 408 for, 96 against, 38 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 75 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls for the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and its production capacity across the EU to be boosted through enhanced EU-level coordination, maximising the use of national initiatives and EU instruments;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 21Abst. 14No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
GreensFor 35Against 0Abst. 5No vote 13 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
S&DFor 97Against 2Abst. 0No vote 36 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 57Against 0Abst. 1No vote 20 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 136Against 0Abst. 0No vote 49 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 63Against 0Abst. 1No vote 18 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 16Against 29Abst. 16No vote 24 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 21Abst. 1No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece001
Croatia100
Italy1700
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1500
Romania500
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 542 members

No vote recorded, 177

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 177 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)Final457 for, 148 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.88 486 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 2 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote447 for, 126 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 458 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 44 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote513 for, 122 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 498 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Military MobilityFinal493 for, 127 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.86 496 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 4 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote439 for, 93 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 456 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 252 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote456 for, 96 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 458 voters
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 4 — part 2 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaSplit vote443 for, 73 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 448 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point g EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote538 for, 75 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.85 496 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 70 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote489 for, 127 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 503 voters
9 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 6 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSeparate vote443 for, 112 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 468 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194591
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 9 — part 3 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194591, reference 2026/2772(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194591 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194591,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 3 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194591}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194591},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194591, reference 2026/2772(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}