Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 2

Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2026
Result
357 for · 144 against · 49 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 33 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR
Official label
B10-0295/2026 – § 9/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0307
Dossier
2026/2772(RSP)
Vote id
194590
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 357 for, 144 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘underlines that deeper integration, coordination and the pooling of resources are indispensable to an effective EU response to Russia’s escalating threats;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 7Against 19Abst. 11No vote 8 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 101Against 2Abst. 0No vote 32 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 134Against 0Abst. 0No vote 51 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 7Against 23Abst. 34No vote 18 of 82Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
PatriotsFor 3Against 57Abst. 0No vote 25 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 19Abst. 4No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Czechia500
Germany2500
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain1500
Finland200
France300
Greece600
Croatia300
Hungary600
Ireland400
Italy600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland2000
Portugal600
Romania400
Sweden500
Slovenia100
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 550 members

No vote recorded, 169

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 169 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 29 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote426 for, 172 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.91 514 voters
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic valuesFinal434 for, 128 against, 104 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.91 533 voters
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 2025 Commission report on UkraineSeparate vote441 for, 119 against, 95 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 515 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Tackling barriers to the single market for defenceFinal393 for, 169 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.89 487 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 30 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment428 for, 164 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 513 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.89 519 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 23 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote404 for, 131 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 468 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIFinal389 for, 191 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.89 513 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 4 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote417 for, 192 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 513 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 451 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194590
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 9 — part 2 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194590, reference 2026/2772(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194590 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194590,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 2 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194590}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194590},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194590, reference 2026/2772(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}