Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 1

Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 1
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2026
Result
319 for · 190 against · 38 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 33 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, ECR · split vote: ECR
Official label
B10-0295/2026 – § 9/1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0307
Dossier
2026/2772(RSP)
Vote id
194589
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 319 for, 190 against, 38 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 58 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Reiterates its call for the urgent establishment of a genuine European Defence Union, including proposals for swift decision-making processes, going beyond existing frameworks, including the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 and the subsequent Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 31Abst. 4No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 36Against 5Abst. 1No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
S&DFor 99Against 2Abst. 0No vote 34 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 54Against 0Abst. 5No vote 19 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 125Against 7Abst. 4No vote 49 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 2Against 39Abst. 23No vote 18 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.41
PatriotsFor 0Against 60Abst. 1No vote 24 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Czechia100
Germany1200
Denmark300
Spain021
Finland100
France300
Croatia100
Italy030
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 547 members

No vote recorded, 172

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 172 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Tackling barriers to the single market for defenceFinal393 for, 169 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.90 484 voters
21 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Final392 for, 179 against, 83 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.90 500 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.90 480 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Final395 for, 197 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.90 504 voters
8 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Competition policy – annual report 2024Final358 for, 124 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.89 443 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 451 voters
2 Apr 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Final399 for, 198 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.89 501 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.89 446 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 448 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 474 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194589
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 9 — part 1 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194589, reference 2026/2772(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194589 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194589,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 1 — Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194589}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194589},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194589, reference 2026/2772(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}