Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6 to paragraph 14

Recruitment of children by organised crime

Vote
Amendment 6 to paragraph 14
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2026
Result
181 for · 379 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 26 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0275/2026 – § 14 – Am 6
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0276
Dossier
2026/2725(RSP)
Vote id
194398
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 379 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 7 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 1No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 108Abst. 0No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 61Abst. 1No vote 16 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 11Against 125Abst. 6No vote 43 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 1No vote 21 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 1No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia200
Germany520
Spain100
France100
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 570 members

No vote recorded, 149

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 149 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital A The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment217 for, 428 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.96 510 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 25 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027Amendment209 for, 447 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 534 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 48 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment195 for, 455 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.95 525 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 56 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment201 for, 453 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.95 529 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment194 for, 441 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 512 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 523 voters
6 May 2025Amendment 7, adding text after recital F Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023Amendment206 for, 431 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 512 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 500 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 14 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment171 for, 338 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 441 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 520 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194398
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 — Recruitment of children by organised crime”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194398, reference 2026/2725(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194398 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194398,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 — Recruitment of children by organised crime}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194398}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194398},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194398, reference 2026/2725(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}