Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9 — part 1, after paragraph 38

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia

Vote
Amendment 9 — part 1, after paragraph 38
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
316 for · 161 against · 175 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: Greens
Official label
A10-0162/2026 – Thomas Waitz – After § 38 – Am 9/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0162
Dossier
2025/2254(INI)
Vote id
194101
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 316 for, 161 against, 175 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Commends the Government of North Macedonia for its rapid response to the antisemitic arson attack targeting a Jewish community building in Skopje on 12 April 2026;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 2Abst. 3No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
GreensFor 0Against 1Abst. 45No vote 7 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 5Against 2Abst. 114No vote 14 of 135Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 17Against 151Abst. 0No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
ECRFor 76Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 68Against 0Abst. 9No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 20Against 4Abst. 2No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium003
Czechia106
Denmark100
Spain600
France2800
Greece100
Hungary800
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.68 563 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 18 Banking Union – annual report 2024Amendment267 for, 246 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 493 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment362 for, 235 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPP, ECR, Renew, Greensr · shared0.67 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment369 for, 236 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.67 560 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 40 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAmendment241 for, 345 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.66 605 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.65 559 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment345 for, 237 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 58 %Requested by EPP, Renew, Greensr · shared0.65 550 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 12 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAmendment327 for, 291 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.65 644 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 39 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote475 for, 181 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.65 596 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 29 to Article 11 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment353 for, 254 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 57 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.63 563 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194101
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 9 — part 1, after paragraph 38 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194101, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194101 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194101,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9 — part 1, after paragraph 38 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194101}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194101},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194101, reference 2025/2254(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}