Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6 to paragraph 57

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Vote
Amendment 6 to paragraph 57
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
202 for · 348 against · 107 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 53 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
A10-0106/2026 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 57 – Am 6
Text
Report A-10-2026-0106
Dossier
2025/2256(INI)
Vote id
194075
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 202 for, 348 against, 107 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 9Against 23Abst. 8No vote 5 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
GreensFor 1Against 0Abst. 45No vote 7 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 5Against 114Abst. 5No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 3Against 165Abst. 2No vote 15 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 50Against 8Abst. 19No vote 5 of 82Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
PatriotsFor 55Against 8Abst. 15No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.56
ESNFor 2Against 24Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 8Against 6Abst. 13No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria002
Belgium002
Czechia001
Germany1012
Denmark003
Spain003
Finland001
France003
Croatia001
Italy004
Lithuania001
Luxembourg001
Latvia001
Netherlands005
Romania001
Sweden003
Slovenia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 18 Banking Union – annual report 2024Amendment267 for, 246 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.58 497 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 38 — part 1 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAmendment316 for, 161 against, 175 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.58 644 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 29 to Article 11 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment353 for, 254 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 57 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.54 568 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment346 for, 254 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 57 %Requested by EPP, Renew, Greensr · shared0.54 558 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment345 for, 237 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 58 %Requested by EPP, Renew, Greensr · shared0.54 555 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment362 for, 235 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPP, ECR, Renew, Greensr · shared0.54 557 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 49 2023 and 2024 reports on SerbiaAmendment236 for, 194 against, 192 abstained Adopted For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.53 563 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment369 for, 236 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.53 566 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 18, adding text after recital 4 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAmendment270 for, 325 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.51 555 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 14 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment179 for, 464 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.51 607 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194075
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6 to paragraph 57 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194075, reference 2025/2256(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194075 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194075,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6 to paragraph 57 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194075}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194075},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194075, reference 2025/2256(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}