Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 18, after paragraph 64

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Vote
Amendment 18, after paragraph 64
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
202 for · 433 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 55 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0106/2026 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 64 – Am 18
Text
Report A-10-2026-0106
Dossier
2025/2256(INI)
Vote id
194076
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 202 for, 433 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 43Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 15Against 147Abst. 8No vote 15 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 3Abst. 8No vote 5 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Greece120
Ireland030
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 68

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 68 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment178 for, 341 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 483 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 15 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment168 for, 333 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 475 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 590 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 553 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 571 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 403 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 538 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 556 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 549 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 14 to paragraph 36 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment202 for, 424 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 575 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 421 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 553 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194076
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 18, after paragraph 64 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194076, reference 2025/2256(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194076 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194076,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 18, after paragraph 64 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194076}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194076},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194076, reference 2025/2256(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}