Amendment 8 to recital AJ · Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries · Vote

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 43	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 45	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 0	Against 48	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 0	Against 123	Abst. 6	No vote 7 of 136	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.93
Renew	For 0	Against 68	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 77	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 31	Against 131	Abst. 7	No vote 16 of 185	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.66
ECR	For 74	Against 0	Abst. 4	No vote 3 of 81	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.92
Patriots	For 77	Against 1	Abst. 1	No vote 6 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.96
ESN	For 24	Against 1	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 15	Against 11	Abst. 3	No vote 1 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–0–3	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–1
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–4–0	3–0–0	7–0–0	0–1–0	3–0–0
Germany	0–4–0	0–14–0	0–14–0	0–9–0	0–29–1	no member voted	no member voted	13–0–0	0–7–0
Denmark	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–20–0	0–1–0	0–20–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–7–0	0–4–0	0–13–0	0–12–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	29–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–1
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	1–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	1–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–0–5	no member voted	9–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–10–0	0–4–0	0–19–0	no member voted	0–8–0	24–0–0	7–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–4–0	2–0–1	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	22–0–1	18–0–0	2–1–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–6	0–2–0	0–7–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	1–4–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	2–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	6–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Austria	0	2	0
Belgium	0	2	0
Czechia	0	1	0
Germany	0	14	0
Denmark	0	3	0
Spain	0	3	0
Finland	0	1	0
France	0	4	0
Croatia	0	1	0
Italy	0	4	0
Lithuania	0	1	0
Luxembourg	0	1	0
Latvia	0	1	0
Netherlands	0	5	0
Romania	0	1	0
Sweden	0	3	0
Slovenia	0	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 668 members

No vote recorded, 51

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 51 members

Name · group that day · country

Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN group that day: S&D · Ireland
Bas EICKHOUT group that day: Greens · Netherlands
Branko GRIMS group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Carla TAVARES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Costas MAVRIDES group that day: S&D · Cyprus
Csaba BOGDÁN group that day: EPP · Hungary
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Elisabetta GUALMINI group that day: Renew · Italy
Eugen TOMAC group that day: Renew · Romania
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Friedrich PÜRNER group that day: No group · Germany
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Galato ALEXANDRAKI group that day: ECR · Greece
Gerald HAUSER group that day: Patriots · Austria
Gheorghe FALCĂ group that day: EPP · Romania
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Irena JOVEVA group that day: Renew · Slovenia
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Leila CHAIBI group that day: The Left · France
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE group that day: EPP · Spain
Nils UŠAKOVS group that day: S&D · Latvia
Norbert HERHAMMER group that day: EPP · Germany
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Pina PICIERNO group that day: S&D · Italy
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ group that day: EPP · Lithuania
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sophia KIRCHER group that day: EPP · Austria
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ group that day: EPP · Czechia
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ group that day: EPP · Slovenia

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 51 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutrality	Amendment	217 for, 416 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by Greens, Renew	r · shared0.95 600 voters
3 Apr 2025	Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industries	Amendment	209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.95 559 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 64 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutrality	Amendment	221 for, 413 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by ECR, Greens, S&D, Renew	r · shared0.95 599 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
8 May 2025	Amendments 3 + 19 (voted as one) to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 1, paragraph 5 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027	Amendment	200 for, 351 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Patriots, S&D, ECR	r · shared0.95 523 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 50 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutrality	Amendment	220 for, 415 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by Greens, S&D, Renew	r · shared0.95 602 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendments 49 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutrality	Amendment	221 for, 407 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by ECR, Greens, S&D, Renew	r · shared0.94 595 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 48 to recital 9 Framework for achieving climate neutrality	Amendment	222 for, 418 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.94 602 voters
22 May 2025	Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus	Amendment	176 for, 380 against, 34 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.94 545 voters
8 May 2025	Amendment 13, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027	Amendment	205 for, 350 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 36 %	Requested by Patriots, The Left	r · shared0.94 523 voters
8 May 2025	Amendment 5 to recital 2 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027	Amendment	202 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.94 525 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Resolution · report by Lukas Mandl 16 Jun 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 11 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 15 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Recital G — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 6 to recital Q Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194356
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 8 to recital AJ — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194356, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194356 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194356,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8 to recital AJ — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194356}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194356},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194356, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}