Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after recital AI

Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries

Vote: Amendment 7, after recital AI
Decision: No. 12 of the sitting of 16 Jun 2026
Result: 218 for · 419 against · 30 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 16 June 2026, 13:56

More facts (6)

Position: vote 27 of 29 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After recital AI – Am 7
Text: Report A-10-2026-0147
Dossier: 2025/2111(INI)
Vote id: 194355

Position: vote 27 of 29 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After recital AI – Am 7
Text: Report A-10-2026-0147
Dossier: 2025/2111(INI)
Vote id: 194355

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 44	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 45	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 0	Against 48	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 2	Against 124	Abst. 3	No vote 7 of 136	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
Renew	For 0	Against 67	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 77	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 23	Against 125	Abst. 21	No vote 16 of 185	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.61
ECR	For 73	Against 0	Abst. 4	No vote 4 of 81	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.92
Patriots	For 79	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 24	Against 1	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 17	Against 10	Abst. 2	No vote 1 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–0–3	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	2–0–0
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	3–0–0	7–0–0	0–1–0	3–0–0
Germany	0–4–0	0–14–0	0–14–0	0–9–0	0–28–0	no member voted	no member voted	13–0–0	0–7–0
Denmark	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–20–0	0–1–0	0–1–19	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–8–0	0–4–0	0–13–0	0–12–0	0–5–0	4–0–0	29–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–1
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	9–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–10–0	0–4–0	0–18–0	no member voted	0–8–0	24–0–0	7–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	2–0–1	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	20–2–1	17–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	2–4–3	0–2–0	0–7–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–4–1	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	6–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Austria	0	2	0
Belgium	0	2	0
Czechia	0	1	0
Germany	0	14	0
Denmark	0	3	0
Spain	0	3	0
Finland	0	1	0
France	0	4	0
Croatia	0	1	0
Italy	0	4	0
Lithuania	0	1	0
Luxembourg	0	1	0
Latvia	0	1	0
Netherlands	0	5	0
Romania	0	1	0
Sweden	0	3	0
Slovenia	0	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN group that day: S&D · Ireland
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Bas EICKHOUT group that day: Greens · Netherlands
Beata SZYDŁO group that day: ECR · Poland
Branko GRIMS group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Carla TAVARES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Dragoş BENEA group that day: S&D · Romania
Elisabetta GUALMINI group that day: Renew · Italy
Eugen TOMAC group that day: Renew · Romania
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Friedrich PÜRNER group that day: No group · Germany
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Galato ALEXANDRAKI group that day: ECR · Greece
Gerald HAUSER group that day: Patriots · Austria
Gheorghe FALCĂ group that day: EPP · Romania
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Irena JOVEVA group that day: Renew · Slovenia
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marion WALSMANN group that day: EPP · Germany
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Niclas HERBST group that day: EPP · Germany
Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE group that day: EPP · Spain
Norbert HERHAMMER group that day: EPP · Germany
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Pina PICIERNO group that day: S&D · Italy
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ group that day: EPP · Lithuania
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sophia KIRCHER group that day: EPP · Austria
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Stefano BONACCINI group that day: S&D · Italy
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ group that day: EPP · Slovenia

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
21 May 2026	Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Amendment	191 for, 371 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.93 535 voters
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 92 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Amendment	220 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.93 587 voters
8 May 2025	Amendments 3 + 19 (voted as one) to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 1, paragraph 5 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027	Amendment	200 for, 351 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Patriots, S&D, ECR	r · shared0.93 521 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
21 May 2026	Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Amendment	198 for, 366 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.93 535 voters
10 Mar 2026	Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Amendment	189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.92 571 voters
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 95 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Amendment	216 for, 412 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.92 597 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 51 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutrality	Amendment	217 for, 416 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 34 %	Requested by Greens, Renew	r · shared0.92 596 voters
21 May 2026	Amendment 27 to paragraph 6 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Amendment	187 for, 380 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 33 %	Requested by Greens, ECR	r · shared0.92 535 voters
8 May 2025	Amendment 5 to recital 2 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027	Amendment	202 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.92 522 voters
13 Nov 2025	Proposal to reject the text Framework for achieving climate neutrality	Rejection	234 for, 399 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 37 %		r · shared0.92 593 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Resolution · report by Lukas Mandl 16 Jun 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 11 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 15 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Recital G — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 6 to recital Q Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194355
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7, after recital AI — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194355, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194355 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194355,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after recital AI — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194355}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194355},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194355, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}