Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: recital U

Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries

Vote
Separate vote: recital U
Result
419 for · 226 against · 20 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 29 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members (a)
Official label
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital U
Vote id
194345
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 419 for, 226 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 63 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 43Abst. 4No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
S&DFor 120Against 2Abst. 6No vote 8 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 162Against 2Abst. 5No vote 16 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 49Against 26Abst. 2No vote 4 of 81Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 20Against 6Abst. 3No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium300
Bulgaria400
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany3000
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland400
France500
Greece700
Croatia600
Hungary005
Ireland400
Italy800
Lithuania200
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland2300
Portugal700
Romania700
Sweden500
Slovenia120
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sectorFinal426 for, 182 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.81 599 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureFinal430 for, 107 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.81 610 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment444 for, 189 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Central Bank – annual report 2024Final378 for, 233 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.80 582 voters
9 Sept 2025Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.79 600 voters
21 May 2026Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposuresFinal294 for, 192 against, 90 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Greens, The Leftr · shared0.78 540 voters
21 May 2026Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisationFinal294 for, 194 against, 86 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Greens, The Leftr · shared0.77 539 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 12 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.77 561 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 16 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote424 for, 157 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.76 581 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial systemFinal390 for, 86 against, 134 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.76 568 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: recital U — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194345, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194345 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194345,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital U — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194345}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194345},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194345, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}