Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 15 Jun 2026
Result
244 for · 179 against · 15 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 June 2026, 18:10
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI
Vote id
193974
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 86Against 0Abst. 0No vote 50 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 110Abst. 0No vote 75 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 33Abst. 0No vote 48 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 27Against 23Abst. 9No vote 26 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.19
ESNFor 0Against 11Abst. 1No vote 15 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 12Against 2Abst. 5No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria030
Belgium020
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Czechia050
Germany0210
Denmark020
Estonia010
Spain0110
Finland020
France020
Greece060
Croatia040
Hungary030
Ireland020
Italy060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg020
Latvia010
Malta010
Netherlands040
Poland0170
Portugal020
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia030
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 438 members

No vote recorded, 281

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 281 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 6 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in PakistanAmendment312 for, 248 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 367 voters
12 Mar 2025Recital H — part 2 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaSplit vote344 for, 297 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 403 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 1, point l Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment320 for, 300 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 404 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 29, adding text after recital F Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment291 for, 303 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 409 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point h — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote286 for, 237 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 357 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 148 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment305 for, 325 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 388 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to recital B The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in PakistanAmendment310 for, 261 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 367 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment336 for, 262 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 396 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesAmendment337 for, 246 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 373 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 405 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-15/193974
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI”. Vote, 15 June 2026. votingId 193974. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-15/193974 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-15-193974,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S\&D Group — AI — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S\&D Group – AI}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-15/193974}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-15/193974},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193974. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}