Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Decision to open negotiations with the Council

Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package)

Vote
Decision to open negotiations with the Council
Result
369 for · 126 against · 84 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:25
More facts (7)
Effect
Negotiating mandate approved — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0139/2026 – Jens Gieseke – Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations
Vote id
193315
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 369 for, 126 against, 84 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Negotiating mandate approved.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 10Against 2Abst. 26No vote 7 of 45Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.53
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 0Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 137Against 0Abst. 1No vote 45 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 2Against 21Abst. 43No vote 15 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
PatriotsFor 6Against 66Abst. 6No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 0Against 13Abst. 8No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy200
Lithuania100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 579 members

No vote recorded, 138

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 138 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Final421 for, 120 against, 108 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.92 529 voters
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic valuesFinal434 for, 128 against, 104 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.91 541 voters
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedFinal426 for, 140 against, 107 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.91 549 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 544 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.90 538 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningFinal447 for, 128 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.90 533 voters
2 Apr 2025Final vote — text as a whole Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Final390 for, 116 against, 126 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.90 511 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote425 for, 199 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.90 541 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal429 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.89 537 voters
18 Dec 2024Final vote — text as a whole Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeFinal441 for, 178 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 523 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Decision to open negotiations with the Council — Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package)”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193315, reference 2025/0097(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193315 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193315,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Decision to open negotiations with the Council — Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193315}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193315},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193315, reference 2025/0097(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}