Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 79

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 79
Result
327 for · 154 against · 31 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 23 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 79
Vote id
193103
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 327 for, 154 against, 31 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 87Against 0Abst. 0No vote 49 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 57Against 1Abst. 1No vote 18 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 56Against 47Abst. 16No vote 64 of 183Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ECRFor 7Against 48Abst. 6No vote 20 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
PatriotsFor 29Against 31Abst. 7No vote 18 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.19
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 1No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria001
Czechia210
Denmark001
Estonia010
Spain020
France040
Greece020
Croatia010
Italy0120
Lithuania010
Latvia200
Netherlands011
Poland0190
Romania240
Sweden003

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 512 members

No vote recorded, 205

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 205 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 410 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AL Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote378 for, 197 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.92 465 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote401 for, 185 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.91 478 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote338 for, 147 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.90 417 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 154 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 423 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote357 for, 134 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 416 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 44 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote349 for, 228 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 472 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote364 for, 120 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.87 405 voters
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote393 for, 194 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 457 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 6 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote414 for, 193 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.87 472 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 79 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193103, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193103 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193103,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 79 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193103}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193103},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193103, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}