Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 49 — part 2

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Paragraph 49 — part 2
Result
358 for · 134 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 49/2
Vote id
193098
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 358 for, 134 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 92Against 0Abst. 0No vote 44 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 59Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 77Against 28Abst. 11No vote 67 of 183Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.50
ECRFor 6Against 50Abst. 6No vote 19 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
PatriotsFor 33Against 28Abst. 9No vote 15 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 11Against 5Abst. 4No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Czechia101
Germany501
Spain010
France001
Greece310
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia201

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 522 members

No vote recorded, 195

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 195 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote338 for, 147 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.90 428 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 421 voters
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 8 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote434 for, 138 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.89 470 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote429 for, 153 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 479 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 146 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 431 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote465 for, 139 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.88 502 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital Z Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote431 for, 165 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 475 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 72 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote365 for, 149 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 442 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote351 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 435 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote357 for, 134 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 424 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 49 — part 2 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193098, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193098 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193098,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 49 — part 2 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193098}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193098},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193098, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}