Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 43

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 43
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
261 for · 105 against · 174 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 43
Text
Report A-10-2026-0083
Dossier
2025/2039(INI)
Vote id
193095
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 261 for, 105 against, 174 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 94Against 0Abst. 0No vote 42 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 58Against 0Abst. 2No vote 17 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 14Against 3Abst. 110No vote 56 of 183Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 3Against 49Abst. 13No vote 16 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 1Against 28Abst. 42No vote 14 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 3No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 12Against 4Abst. 4No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium200
Bulgaria200
Germany1200
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1500
Finland100
France1000
Greece100
Croatia100
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1000
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal600
Romania500
Sweden500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 540 members

No vote recorded, 177

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 177 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment263 for, 108 against, 222 abstained Adopted For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 458 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 48 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote322 for, 313 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 492 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 470 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote281 for, 324 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.84 481 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote293 for, 343 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.84 497 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital O — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote269 for, 302 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.84 450 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 33 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote303 for, 328 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.84 491 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 48 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote409 for, 150 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 486 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote299 for, 354 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 498 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote275 for, 252 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 448 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193095
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 43 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193095, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193095 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193095,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 43 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193095}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193095},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193095, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}